Subsidence is a significant structural issue that can lead to costly repairs if left unaddressed. Among the primary causes, tree roots are a common subsidence culprit. This is especially the case in clay soils where moisture fluctuations result in ground movement. Having an understanding of how to prevent subsidence with root barriers equips professionals to safeguard foundations from potential damage. This approach is particularly effective in mitigating the risks associated with clay shrinkage and soil movement.
In this guest article for Root Barrier Store, Dr. Graeme Allen—a leading chartered civil engineer and subsidence specialist consultant, with a doctoral thesis on root barriers and clay shrinkage subsidence—shares his expert insights. From pinpointing the causes of subsidence to exploring the solutions, Dr. Allen offers practical guidance for addressing this complex issue. He highlights proven, sustainable methods to fix subsidence caused by trees,providing long-term protection for affected properties.
What is Subsidence?
Subsidence is the downwards movement of one part of a foundation causing cracking and distortions to a building. This process can occur naturally due to geological conditions or be triggered by human activities. Damage is often covered by insurance policies, depending on the definition of subsidence within policy documents.
Data from The Association of British Insurers (ABI) reveals that there were 23,000 domestic subsidence claims in 2022. This resulted in subidence related insurance claims totalled at around £219 million.
Understanding what causes subsidence allows homeowners, builders, and engineers to take measures that can prevent substantial damage and costly repairs.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77d44/77d44bc1cc37542e8f0689175b77cf9a9ad12da3" alt="A gap between layers of bricks caused be separtion along the cement layer due to subsidence"
Causes of Subsidence
The list below highlights some common causes of subsidence:
- Clay Shrinkage Subsidence occurs when clay soils lose moisture - this can be as a result of tree root activity.
- Mining Activities: Excavation and mining can lead to significant ground movement and destabilization of the soil.
- Leaking Drains: can saturate the soil, leading to washing out of fine material on gravel soils or softening of clay soils.
-
Decomposition of Organic Materials: The decay of organic materials in the soil can create voids and lead to ground movement.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a0fee/a0feeb9d0f82bbacb2df6b50e1c39ae9ff83e29d" alt="a vertical crack running all the way up a brick wall casued by building subsidence"
Soil Types
In the first instance, it is important to establish the type of soils that the foundations are resting upon. Different soils respond in distinct ways to changing environmental conditions.
Clay or Cohesive soils have a particular property whereby they change volume with changing moisture content. This is because the particles are exceptionally small and the soil’s behaviour depends on the clay mineralogy and pore water chemistry.
In contrast, sands and gravels consist of relatively larger, discrete particles that hold water within the available void spaces. As a result, these soils do not undergo significant volume changes when moisture content fluctuates.
The soil type considered in this article are clay soils, such as London Clay, as root barriers can resolve clay shrinkage subsidence on clay soils.
Clay Shrinkage Subsidence
In clay or cohesive soils, clay shrinkage subsidence occurs due to volumetric changes caused by moisture content fluctuations.
Trees near a building can affect the soil’s moisture content and volume by drawing large amounts of water from clay soil. In summer, when trees require the most moisture and rainfall is minimal, they extract water from the soil, causing it to shrink. During wetter winter months, when trees are mostly dormant, the soil absorbs moisture and swells. This is usually referred to as seasonal movement.
Most buildings will accommodate normal seasonal movement and this will not lead to structural damage. Structural damage can occur if the moisture content changes significantly. This often happens during very dry summers or when large trees are nearby.
The main factors to consider with clay shrinkage subsidence are tree species, height and distance from the property, foundation type, depth, soil characteristics and weather conditions.
Not all trees are equally likely to cause damage. Broad-leaf trees such as Oak and Willow have roots that spread over long distances and they have a high water demand. Conifers and Pines have lesser affect than broad-leaf trees as their roots generally do not spread out as far.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/20c4f/20c4f831a47d9d6848e4bbd9c4e07b1179b58c66" alt="A vertical crack running up the brickwork with different layers of underground material also exposed, including clay"
Solutions for Subsidence Caused by Trees
Underpinning
Tree Management
Root pruning
Root Barriers
Root Barrier as a Solution
The stated benefits of root barriers are summarised below:
-
Avoids tree removal: Root barriers allow for the preservation of trees, maintaining their monetary, environmental and aesthetic benefits.
-
Cost-effective: Usually, installing root barriers is a more cost effective option than underpinning. Furthermore, if the value of trees is properly recognised in the assessment, root barriers are often more economical than tree removal or pruning in cases where there are multiple trees or large trees in urban areas.
- Preserves environmental value: Root barriers preserve trees maintaining their numerous beneficial effects whilst dealing with clay shrinkage subsidence.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/544ac/544ac53b1be9cd53cb53c799ea13d6c1e9bd3053" alt="Half the end of full roll of permeable root barrier"
Value of trees
Critical to the assessment of the root barrier solution is appreciating the value of trees.
Trees provide over 40 different benefits contributing positively to urban environments. These benefits include increasing property values, reducing crime, helping to reduce the effects of climate change, improve air quality, improve shading, improve drainage and encourage wildlife.
In pure monetary terms, the value of a tree in UK can be calculated using a variety of tree valuation systems. An individual tree can be valued up to £500,000 depending on its size, species and location.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eb491/eb491677ef31568f9b633ef4a8679449561355a1" alt="profile view of an oak tree representing 'UK tree valution systems' (heading). Text also included: CAVAT, Helliwell & i-Tree"
Root Barrier Materials
Design Considerations
-
Barrier depth: Root barriers need to be installed up to 5m deep, depending on site-specific requirements, to ensure roots do not grow under the barrier.
-
Barrier length: The length of the barrier should be considered carefully to avoid roots from growing around the barrier.
-
Proximity to trees and buildings: Careful consideration of the location of barriers is essential to ensure installation of the barrier does not damage the tree, by being too close for example.
- Durability and installation constraints: The durability of the materials used and practical installation challenges must be addressed to ensure long-term effectiveness.
When to Use Root Barriers for Subsidence
- Properties affected by large or multiple trees: Particularly trees with higher values and with diameters greater than 400mm.
- Sites where preserving high-value trees is essential: This includes areas where trees provide significant monetary, ecological, aesthetic, or social value.
- Situations where underpinning or tree removal is less desirable: In cases where other solutions are not feasible or acceptable.
- Trees very close to buildings: There may not be sufficient space to install the barrier in some cases.
- Scenarios where alternative solutions are more cost-effective: In some cases, tree removal might be a more economical choice, especially where trees provide minor monetary, ecological, aesthetic, or social value.
- Multiple services or obstacles: Root barriers may not be viable in cases where access is particularly difficult or where there are multiple services, or obstacles such as walls, buildings or features.
Challenges
Despite their benefits, there are challenges associated with the implementation of root barriers for subsidence.
Currently, there is not any guidance or standardised design protocols to employ, when root barriers could provide a viable solution. My thesis examines this issue and offers practical solutions:
'A Framework for Subsidence Practitioners to Optimise the Benefits and Practical Use of Root Barriers to Resolve Clay Shrinkage Subsidence and Prevent the Unnecessary Loss of Valuable Trees'
Summary
Traditional methods such as underpinning and tree management still play a vital role, but modern solutions like root barriers offer a promising avenue for addressing the issue while preserving the social economic and wellbeing value of trees.
With proper design and implementation, root barriers can provide a cost effective and sustainable solution to the challenges posed by clay shrinkage subsidence.
Further reading
Available published research on root barriers to resolve clay shrinkage is contained within a comprehensive thesis entitled
'A Framework for Subsidence Practitioners to Optimise the Benefits and Practical Use of Root Barriers to Resolve Clay Shrinkage Subsidence and Prevent the Unnecessary Loss of Valuable Trees'
by Graeme Allen B.Eng, CEng, MSc, MICE
The thesis is focused on investigating clay shrinkage subsidence and the use of root barriers as a solution to prevent damage to buildings caused by tree roots, particularly in urban areas where clay soils are prevalent. It outlines the research aims and objectives, which include identifying key variables and perceptions regarding the effectiveness and reliability of root barriers, as well as developing a design protocol for their implementation.
The thesis features a critical literature review that highlights a significant gap in published information about root barriers, emphasizing the need for guidelines and best practices in their use. The research methodology includes case studies and surveys to gather data on practitioners' experiences and perceptions regarding root barriers, exploring both quantitative and qualitative dimensions. The findings culminate in an informed design protocol that provides practical guidelines for the design and construction of root barriers, aiming to balance the value of trees with the need to protect buildings from subsidence.